Moderator: Moderators
Cookie wrote:Any one watch his show on channel 4 the other night?
samurai69 wrote:cant stand the little rubber lipped prick
Cookie wrote:samurai69 wrote:cant stand the little rubber lipped prick
So you did not watch it then
samurai69 wrote:no......................would sooner stick lighted matches in to my eyes
samurai69 wrote:yanks, so far ahead, yet so far behind
Scott wrote:Britain isnt any better though.
our politicians are clearly in the pockets of food companies and will sell out your health to make a few quid.
Cookie wrote:They seemed to find justification in using the flavoured milk to make sure the kids reached their daily recommended targets for the nutrients in the milk
Scott wrote:yeah, that is retarded.
but I dont think the US has anything to do with how food companies in this country are allowed to lie and twist words in order to turn over a few quid. Britain - or the people who run it - are in bed with them.
Scott wrote:at least in America they dont let mcvities get away with calling their biscuits 'digestives'
Cookie wrote:
New one on me that. Do divulge.
A lot of that is down to "spin" & the way anything & everything on tv is twisted to sound better than it actually is. All this "92% of women" rubbish is a classic example. When they come out with it on the voice over the little bit of text tucked away at the bottom of the screen usually shows a poxy number of women who were actually tested or asked during the study
Scott wrote:it was on an episode of QI urban myth that they have to be sold under a different name in the US because they dont aid digestion. There has been talk of whether or not the name is strictly legal though.
Scott wrote:yeah, there is so much of that but theres loads more:
They told us they would restrict advertising of junk cereal during kids cartoons...... but still allow the same kids cartoons to be 'sponsered' by the cereal brand, before and after the begining and end of the show including ad breaks you have adverts for the cereal. If thats not bad enough they allow them to imply (in the case of chocolate wheetos ) that this is some sort of 'power' food.
Scott wrote:They told us they would stop the super sizing of chocolate bars ie 'kingsize'..... but let them instead replace a kingsize mars with a mars trio, which was about the same size!
Scott wrote:have you watched supersize vs super skinny? it makes me very suspicious that every week when this 'doctor / nutritionalist' is telling these guys what they should eat as a balanced diet he always ends with 'breakfast cereal'. That is very dodgy if you ask me.
Scott wrote:At my kids school they have 'fruity friday' where if you dont have a bit of fruit as a snack you are not allowed to eat a snack............ never mind that every day they still serve chips and pizza and shit like that in the canteen.
I could go on....................
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests