Moderator: Moderators
samurai69 wrote:well we all knew that didnt we
Scott wrote:not in my experience tbh. would need to see more of that study. was it actually the drinks.... what was the rest of their diets like?
The results still stood even when other factors such as exercise, social class, education and smoking were taken into account.
so why the article attempts to then claim that it does indeed make you fat is just crazy.researchers cannot yet conclusively say diet drinks cause those expanding waistlines
Scott wrote:all I see is that the bottom line is -so why the article attempts to then claim that it does indeed make you fat is just crazy.researchers cannot yet conclusively say diet drinks cause those expanding waistlines
it doesnt really matter if diet soda drinkers tend to eat more junk because they feel that their diet drink 'counter acts' the junk. It doesnt matter if those who do not drink diet sodas wil 'in general' have a much healthier diet.
There is more than likely other factors which expain the fatness of diet soda drinkers yet those reports seem to be desperately saying diet soda makes you fat..... but I cant see at all how their results can point to that. Maybe the average diet soda drinker just has a shittier diet in general.
most of that report seems to be 'maybe this and maybe that'.
My own thoughts on the whole matter are that the body is not stupid.
Millions of years of evolution & you can't kid it that a "sweetener" is not going to cause some sort of chemical / hormonal reaction within the body. I just is not happening. It senses sweetness & instincts with kick in.
if you remember, about that experiment I saw with rugby players being given either a diet drink or the regular sugary equivalent after a training session. Those drinking the diet version consumed, I think, 400 calories more than those who had the sugar version when they compared their food totals at their post training solid food meal.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests